Well here’s two films I’ve seen recently that were similar
in their merits and faults. Both received largely negative reviews and both
were kind of undeserving on that front. These aren’t masterpieces by any
measure but they certainly are entertaining action movies that are a little too
long and not as smart as they’d like to be. However they’re still perfectly
competent and indeed superior to many films that have received better reviews
in the same vein.
Man of Steel is a Goyer/Nolan collaboration directed by Zack
Snyder of Watchmen fame, and it sort of has all three traits combined in the
film. The action is over the top and ludicrous, the care for collateral damage
is utterly minimal unless there’s actually visible people dying, and there’s a
fuckload of exposition but it’s not super interesting and integral exposition
like one might expect from a Nolan picture.
Lois Lane, played by Amy Adams, is terribly written; which
is kind of a shame given they got one of the best actresses to play her; but
this is also a common theme in Nolan pictures. It isn’t directed by Christopher
Nolan and thus its mere slightly above averageness isn’t a pockmark on his as
of yet perfect career. Russell Crowe,
still awesome in everything and still one of my personal favorites is
excellent, and it very much has that Robin Hood vibe where the actors are all
acting well and the action is great but it isn’t at its core a very compelling
story. This serves to make it a
perfectly fine but not great picture.
The Lone Ranger is a Western and I fucking love Westerns so
it’s difficult for me to dislike it on principal. The film is pretty good
though to be honest, there’s some nice references to The Good, The Bad, and The
Ugly as well as to Once Upon a Time in the West and I love that shit. However
there’s a musical cue that’s pretty much dead taken from Once Upon a Time in
the West that means a whole lot for that movie but isn’t really that meaningful
in this; which is sort of moderately disappointing. It’s another well acted
film with over the top ludicrous action and a fair amount of okay Gore
Verbinski/Depp Comedy. It is miles better than the last two Pirates movies but
also not as good as Curse of the Black Pearl.
Now the interesting thing is which one of these to watch? Well
since the Lone Ranger is a western it’s almost destined to do somewhat poorly
so if you’d like to see a sequel (and I would) then go watch that, it is for
the most part a better movie. Man of Steel has more impressive action sequences
but the Lone Ranger has a semi-interesting plot even if they don’t evoke all of
the emotions they’re trying to. There’s no “Half man from the train” for Henry
Fonda to brutalize and no amazing comic relief villain but it still tries to
do some good things that happened in other Westerns and you have to give it
points; the film’s got heart. Man of Steel is guaranteed to have a sequel and does also have the potential to get better but I think it's slightly worse on the whole.
No comments:
Post a Comment